Carmel v. Commissioner of Social Security, C18-1457-JCC. (2019)
Court: District Court, D. Washington
Number: infdco20190606j95
Visitors: 4
Filed: Jun. 05, 2019
Latest Update: Jun. 05, 2019
Summary: ORDER JOHN C. COUGHENOUR , District Judge . Based on the stipulation of the parties, it is ORDERED that the Commissioner's decision in regard to Plaintiff's application for supplemental security income under Title XVI of the Social Security Act be REVERSED and REMANDED to the Commissioner of Social Security for a de novo hearing pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. 405(g). Upon remand, the Commissioner shall reconsider the opinion of Richard Ries, M.D. Furthermore, the Commissioner sh
Summary: ORDER JOHN C. COUGHENOUR , District Judge . Based on the stipulation of the parties, it is ORDERED that the Commissioner's decision in regard to Plaintiff's application for supplemental security income under Title XVI of the Social Security Act be REVERSED and REMANDED to the Commissioner of Social Security for a de novo hearing pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. 405(g). Upon remand, the Commissioner shall reconsider the opinion of Richard Ries, M.D. Furthermore, the Commissioner sho..
More
ORDER
JOHN C. COUGHENOUR, District Judge.
Based on the stipulation of the parties, it is ORDERED that the Commissioner's decision in regard to Plaintiff's application for supplemental security income under Title XVI of the Social Security Act be REVERSED and REMANDED to the Commissioner of Social Security for a de novo hearing pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). Upon remand, the Commissioner shall reconsider the opinion of Richard Ries, M.D. Furthermore, the Commissioner should re-evaluate the claimant's impairments, the medical evidence (including the opinions of Drs. Czysz and Severinghaus), the effect of the claimant's drug and alcohol abuse, the claimant's statements, any lay witness statements, the claimant's RFC, and the claimant's ability to perform work at steps four and five, as necessary.
Source: Leagle
