Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Hart v. CF Arcis VII LLC, C17-01932-RSM. (2018)

Court: District Court, D. Washington Number: infdco20180328834 Visitors: 7
Filed: Mar. 27, 2018
Latest Update: Mar. 27, 2018
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING CASE DEADLINES RICARDO S. MARTINEZ , Chief District Judge . Plaintiffs and Defendants CF Arcis VII LLC, CF Arcis IV Holdings, LLC, Arcis Equity Partners, LLC, and Blake Walker (the "Arcis Defendants"), by and through their counsel, stipulate and agree as follows: 1. On February 5, 2018, the Court, upon the parties' stipulation, entered an Order various deadlines on Defendants' pending Motion to Dismiss, the Rule 26(f) conference, Initial Disclosures, and the
More

STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING CASE DEADLINES

Plaintiffs and Defendants CF Arcis VII LLC, CF Arcis IV Holdings, LLC, Arcis Equity Partners, LLC, and Blake Walker (the "Arcis Defendants"), by and through their counsel, stipulate and agree as follows:

1. On February 5, 2018, the Court, upon the parties' stipulation, entered an Order various deadlines on Defendants' pending Motion to Dismiss, the Rule 26(f) conference, Initial Disclosures, and the Joint Status Report, as well as a deadline for Plaintiffs to file any amended complaint. Dkt. 15.

2. Since then, the parties have focused on informal resolution discussions. Those discussions continue, and the parties expect they will know whether such discussions will be successful by April 9, 2018. If resolution discussions fail to succeed, Plaintiffs intend to amend their complaint, rendering the pending Motion to Dismiss and noting date moot. As a result, the parties stipulate and agree to ask the Court to strike the noting date for the pending Motion to Dismiss, and to extend the remaining deadlines in the Order as follows:

Event Existing Deadline New Deadline Plaintiffs' Second Amended Monday, March 26, 2018 Monday, April 9, 2018 Complaint Rule 26(f) Conference Monday, March 19, 2018 Monday, April 16, 2018 Initial Disclosures under Monday, March 26, 2018 Monday, April 23, 2018 Rule 26(a)(1) Combined Joint Status Thursday, April 5, 2018 Monday, April 23, 2018 Report and Discovery Plan under Rule 26(f) and LCR 26(f) Defendants' Response to the N/A Thursday, May 10, 2018 Second Amended Complaint

3. If Defendants respond to the Second Amended Complaint with a Rule 12 motion, the parties agree to propose a briefing schedule and noting date on the motion.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

ORDER

Based on the foregoing Stipulation, the Court ORDERS that the case deadlines shall be adjusted as stated above.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer