Wilson v. Berryhill, 3:17-cv-00407. (2019)
Court: District Court, E.D. Tennessee
Number: infdco20190405a70
Visitors: 3
Filed: Mar. 29, 2019
Latest Update: Mar. 29, 2019
Summary: ORDER PAMELA L. REEVES , District Judge . This matter is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation filed by United States Magistrate Judge, Bruce Guyton [D. 21]. There have been no timely objections to the Report and Recommendation, and enough time has passed since the filing of the Report and Recommendation to treat any objections as having been waived. See 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1); FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b). The Court has conducted a thorough review of the record and is in agreement
Summary: ORDER PAMELA L. REEVES , District Judge . This matter is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation filed by United States Magistrate Judge, Bruce Guyton [D. 21]. There have been no timely objections to the Report and Recommendation, and enough time has passed since the filing of the Report and Recommendation to treat any objections as having been waived. See 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1); FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b). The Court has conducted a thorough review of the record and is in agreement w..
More
ORDER
PAMELA L. REEVES, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation filed by United States Magistrate Judge, Bruce Guyton [D. 21]. There have been no timely objections to the Report and Recommendation, and enough time has passed since the filing of the Report and Recommendation to treat any objections as having been waived. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b).
The Court has conducted a thorough review of the record and is in agreement with the Magistrate Judge's findings that substantial evidence supports the weight assigned to the opinion of the consulting examiner, Albert J. Whitaker, Jr., M.D., and that the additional evidence presented is not material. Accordingly, the Court ACCEPTS IN WHOLE the Report and Recommendation under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b). It is ORDERED, for the reasons stated in the Report and Recommendation, which the Court adopts and incorporates into its ruling, that claimant's motion for summary judgment [D. 16] be DENIED and the Commissioner's motion for summary judgment [D. 17] should be GRANTED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
