Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Shaev v. Saper, 02-2206 (2003)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit Number: 02-2206 Visitors: 6
Filed: Feb. 26, 2003
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: Opinions of the United 2003 Decisions States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 2-26-2003 Shaev v. Saper Precedential or Non-Precedential: Precedential Docket 02-2206 Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2003 Recommended Citation "Shaev v. Saper" (2003). 2003 Decisions. Paper 765. http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2003/765 This decision is brought to you for free and open access by the Opinions of the United States Court
More
Opinions of the United 2003 Decisions States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 2-26-2003 Shaev v. Saper Precedential or Non-Precedential: Precedential Docket 02-2206 Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2003 Recommended Citation "Shaev v. Saper" (2003). 2003 Decisions. Paper 765. http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2003/765 This decision is brought to you for free and open access by the Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit at Villanova University School of Law Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in 2003 Decisions by an authorized administrator of Villanova University School of Law Digital Repository. For more information, please contact Benjamin.Carlson@law.villanova.edu. PRECEDENTIAL Filed February 26, 2003 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT No. 02-2206 DAVID B. SHAEV, Appellant v. LAWRENCE SAPER; ALAN B. ABRAMSON; DAVID ALTSCHILLER; JOSEPH GRAYZEL, M.D.; GEORGE HELLER; ARNO NASH; DATASCOPE CORP. Appeal from the United States District Court For the District of New Jersey D.C. No.: 01-CV-3744 (JAP) District Judge: Honorable Joel A. Pisano Argued: December 20, 2002 Before: SLOVITER, McKEE, and ROSENN, Circuit Judges. (Opinion Filed February 21, 2003) ORDER AMENDING OPINION The slip opinion in the above case is hereby amended as follows: 1. At the end of page 5, after "See" insert "Dist. Ct. Op. at." 2. On page 15, the last line of footnote 7, replace the word "businesses" with "bonuses." 3. On page 17, at the end of footnote 10, replace "Security" with "Securities Exchange." BY THE COURT: /s/ Judge Max RosennCircuit Judge Dated: February 26 2003 A True Copy: Teste: Clerk of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer