Comras v. Berryhill, C18-5082-MAT. (2018)
Court: District Court, D. Washington
Number: infdco20180206g69
Visitors: 10
Filed: Feb. 05, 2018
Latest Update: Feb. 05, 2018
Summary: ORDER GRANTING IN FORMA PAUPERIS APPLICATION MARY ALICE THEILER , Magistrate Judge . Plaintiff's application to proceed in forma pauperis (Dkt. 1) is GRANTED. Plaintiff does not appear to have funds available to afford the $400.00 filing fee. (1) The Clerk is directed to issue summonses to plaintiff. (2) Plaintiff is responsible for serving the complaint and summonses, and must file proof of service as required by Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Plaintiff may effectuate
Summary: ORDER GRANTING IN FORMA PAUPERIS APPLICATION MARY ALICE THEILER , Magistrate Judge . Plaintiff's application to proceed in forma pauperis (Dkt. 1) is GRANTED. Plaintiff does not appear to have funds available to afford the $400.00 filing fee. (1) The Clerk is directed to issue summonses to plaintiff. (2) Plaintiff is responsible for serving the complaint and summonses, and must file proof of service as required by Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Plaintiff may effectuate s..
More
ORDER GRANTING IN FORMA PAUPERIS APPLICATION
MARY ALICE THEILER, Magistrate Judge.
Plaintiff's application to proceed in forma pauperis (Dkt. 1) is GRANTED. Plaintiff does not appear to have funds available to afford the $400.00 filing fee.
(1) The Clerk is directed to issue summonses to plaintiff.
(2) Plaintiff is responsible for serving the complaint and summonses, and must file proof of service as required by Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Plaintiff may effectuate service electronically as detailed in General Orders 04-15 and 05-15, by sending a copy of the summonses and complaint, along with plaintiff's identifying information, by email to
Source: Leagle
