REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

BRISTOW MARCHANT, Magistrate Judge.

This action has been filed by the Plaintiff, pro se, pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff, who appears to have been a pre-trial detainee at the Richland County Detention Center during the time period set forth in the Complaint,1 alleges violations of his constitutional rights by the named Defendants.

The Defendants filed motions for summary judgment on August 18, 2017. As the Plaintiff is proceeding pro se, a Roseboro Order was entered by the Court on August 22, 2017, advising Plaintiff of the importance of a dispositive motion and of the need for him to file an adequate response. Plaintiff was specifically advised that if he failed to respond, the Defendants' motions may be granted, thereby ending his case. However, notwithstanding the specific warning and instructions as set forth by the Court in the Roseboro order, Plaintiff has failed to file any response to the Defendants motions for summary judgment, or to contact the Court in any way.2 See Baber v. Hospital Corp. of America, 977 F.2d 872, 874-875 (4th Cir. 2991)[Once moving party establishes basis for summary judgment, to survive summary judgment the opposing party must respond with evidence showing a genuine issue for trial].

As Plaintiff failed to respond to the Defendants motions for summary judgment or to contact the Court in any way, notwithstanding the specific warning and instructions as set forth in the Court's Roseboro order, the undersigned finds that Plaintiff meets all of the criteria for dismissal under Chandler Leasing Corp. . Lopez, 669 F.2d 919 (4th Cir. 1982).3 Accordingly, this action should be dismissed for lack of prosecution. See Davis v. Williams, 588 F.2d 69, 70 (4th Cir. 1978); Rule 41(b), Fed.R.Civ.P.;4 see also Coker v. International Paper Co., No. 08-1865, 2010 WL 1072643, at * 2["[A] plaintiff can abandon claims by failing to address them in response to a summary judgment motion."]; Jones v. Danek Medical, Inc., No. 96-3323, 1999 WL 1133272 at * 3 (D.S.C. Oct. 12, 1999)["The failure of a party to address an issue raised in summary judgment may be considered a waiver or abandonment of the relevant cause of action."].

The Clerk shall mail this Report and Recommendation to Plaintiff at his last known address. If the Plaintiff notifies the Court within the time set forth for filing objections to this Report and Recommendation that he wishes to continue with this case and provides a response to the motions for summary judgment, the Clerk is directed to vacate this Report and Recommendation and return this file to the undersigned for further handling. If, however, no objections are filed, the Clerk shall forward this Report and Recommendation to the District Judge for disposition. Ballard v. Carlson, 882 F.2d 93, 95 (4th Cir. 1989), cert. denied sub nom, Ballard v. Volunteers of America, 493 U.S. 1084 (1990) [Magistrate Judge's prior explicit warning that a recommendation of dismissal would result from plaintiff failing to obey his order was proper grounds for the district court to dismiss suit when plaintiff did not comply despite warning].

The parties are referred to the Notice Page attached hereto.