Filed: Oct. 07, 2019
Latest Update: Oct. 07, 2019
Summary: OPINION AND ORDER JAMES P. JONES , District Judge . Reginald Darwin Morton, a federal inmate, has submitted a letter, which I will treat as a pro se motion, seeking a sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2). A jury found Morton guilty of drug-related charges on May 29, 2009. I entered his criminal judgment on September 18, 2009, and sentenced him to 240 months incarceration. J. 2, ECF No. 2267. Morton appealed and the court of appeals affirmed his conviction but remanded for resent
Summary: OPINION AND ORDER JAMES P. JONES , District Judge . Reginald Darwin Morton, a federal inmate, has submitted a letter, which I will treat as a pro se motion, seeking a sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2). A jury found Morton guilty of drug-related charges on May 29, 2009. I entered his criminal judgment on September 18, 2009, and sentenced him to 240 months incarceration. J. 2, ECF No. 2267. Morton appealed and the court of appeals affirmed his conviction but remanded for resente..
More
OPINION AND ORDER
JAMES P. JONES, District Judge.
Reginald Darwin Morton, a federal inmate, has submitted a letter, which I will treat as a pro se motion, seeking a sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2).
A jury found Morton guilty of drug-related charges on May 29, 2009. I entered his criminal judgment on September 18, 2009, and sentenced him to 240 months incarceration. J. 2, ECF No. 2267. Morton appealed and the court of appeals affirmed his conviction but remanded for resentencing based on United States v. Simmons, 649 F.3d 237 (4th Cir. 2011). United States v. Morton, 443 F. App'x 775, 781 (4th Cir. 2011) (unpublished). On March 19, 2012, I resentenced Morton to 210 months imprisonment. Am. J. 2, ECF No. 2789.1 Morton again appealed, and the Fourth Circuit affirmed his sentence. United States v. Morton, 499 F. App'x 310, 313 (4th Cir. 2012) (unpublished).
Since then, Morton then filed a number of additional motions, including a Motion to Reduce Sentence, ECF No. 2960, a Motion for a New Trial, ECF No. 3195, and a Motion to Recuse, ECF No. 3196, all of which I denied, ECF Nos. 2962, 3199. Morton appealed the denial of his Motion for a New Trial and Motion to Recuse, but the Fourth Circuit affirmed, United States v. Morton, 589 F. App'x 231, 231 (4th Cir. 2015) (unpublished). Morton filed two motions to reduce his sentence under § 3582(c)(2), based on Amendment 782, ECF Nos. 3269, 3276, which I denied on June 3, 2015, ECF No. 3289.
Morton thereafter filed a motion to vacate his sentence under 28 U.S.C. § 2255, which was denied on March 13, 2018, ECF No. 3544, and his appeal dismissed, United States v. Morton, 727 F. App'x 65, 66 (4th Cir. 2018) (unpublished).
Morton's present motion based on Amendment 782 is a repeat of earlier motions. It is denied for the same reason — that even applying Amendment 782, his new guideline range (262 to 327 months) would be greater than the 210 month sentence he received. See U.S. Sentencing Commission Guidelines Manual § found in the guidelines, I varied downward to a sentence of 210 months. Tr. 10-11, ECF No. 2837. 1B1.10(b)(2) (2018). Accordingly, it is ORDERED that Morton's motion, ECF No. 3757, is DENIED.
