Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

U.S. v. MURRAY, 12-7160. (2012)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: infco20120914130 Visitors: 7
Filed: Sep. 14, 2012
Latest Update: Sep. 14, 2012
Summary: Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Rudolph Valentino Murray appeals the district court's order denying his motion seeking a reduction of sentence under 18 U.S.C. 3582(c) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error, given that Murray is ineligible for the reduction that he seeks. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court. United States v. Murray, No. 2:97-cr-00025-AWA-1 (E.D. Va. May 31, 2012). We dispense with o
More

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Rudolph Valentino Murray appeals the district court's order denying his motion seeking a reduction of sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error, given that Murray is ineligible for the reduction that he seeks. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court. United States v. Murray, No. 2:97-cr-00025-AWA-1 (E.D. Va. May 31, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer