U.S. v. MURRAY, 12-7160. (2012)
Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Number: infco20120914130
Visitors: 8
Filed: Sep. 14, 2012
Latest Update: Sep. 14, 2012
Summary: Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Rudolph Valentino Murray appeals the district court's order denying his motion seeking a reduction of sentence under 18 U.S.C. 3582(c) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error, given that Murray is ineligible for the reduction that he seeks. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court. United States v. Murray, No. 2:97-cr-00025-AWA-1 (E.D. Va. May 31, 2012). We dispense with o
Summary: Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Rudolph Valentino Murray appeals the district court's order denying his motion seeking a reduction of sentence under 18 U.S.C. 3582(c) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error, given that Murray is ineligible for the reduction that he seeks. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court. United States v. Murray, No. 2:97-cr-00025-AWA-1 (E.D. Va. May 31, 2012). We dispense with or..
More
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Rudolph Valentino Murray appeals the district court's order denying his motion seeking a reduction of sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error, given that Murray is ineligible for the reduction that he seeks. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court. United States v. Murray, No. 2:97-cr-00025-AWA-1 (E.D. Va. May 31, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Source: Leagle
