Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Mills v. Saul, 3:19-CV-239-HBG. (2020)

Court: District Court, E.D. Tennessee Number: infdco20200110d95 Visitors: 14
Filed: Jan. 09, 2020
Latest Update: Jan. 09, 2020
Summary: ORDER OF REMAND UNDER SENTENCE FOUR OF 42 U.S.C. 405(g) BRUCE GUYTON , Magistrate Judge . Before the Court are the Parties' Joint Motion to for Entry of Judgment [Doc. 20] and Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment [Doc. 16]. Pursuant to the power of this Court under sentence four of section 205(g) of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. 405(g) and in light of the joint motion to remand this action, the Court now, upon substantive review, hereby GRANTS the Joint Motion for Entry of J
More

ORDER OF REMAND UNDER SENTENCE FOUR OF 42 U.S.C. § 405(g)

Before the Court are the Parties' Joint Motion to for Entry of Judgment [Doc. 20] and Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment [Doc. 16].

Pursuant to the power of this Court under sentence four of section 205(g) of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) and in light of the joint motion to remand this action, the Court now, upon substantive review, hereby GRANTS the Joint Motion for Entry of Judgment [Doc. 20], remanding this cause to the Commissioner according to the following terms. See Shalala v. Schaefer, 509 U.S. 292, 296 (1993).

Upon remand, the Appeals Council will remand the case to an ALJ pursuant to SSR 19-1p. Plaintiff will be given a full rehearing on all issues in the case.

Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment [Doc. 16] is therefore DENIED AS MOOT. The Court will enter a separate judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer