U.S. v. BURTON, 3:07-773-JFA. (2012)
Court: District Court, D. South Carolina
Number: infdco20120724b53
Visitors: 19
Filed: Jul. 23, 2012
Latest Update: Jul. 23, 2012
Summary: ORDER JOSEPH F. ANDERSON, Jr., District Judge. The defendant has filed a pro se "Motion to Reconsider Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e)." The government is respectfully requested to respond to this motion within thirty days. The defendant has also filed a motion to amend his motion for reconsideration to correct typographical errors. This motion to amend is granted (ECF No. 359). The Clerk shall file the amended motion for reconsideration (which is attached to the motion to amend) and termi
Summary: ORDER JOSEPH F. ANDERSON, Jr., District Judge. The defendant has filed a pro se "Motion to Reconsider Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e)." The government is respectfully requested to respond to this motion within thirty days. The defendant has also filed a motion to amend his motion for reconsideration to correct typographical errors. This motion to amend is granted (ECF No. 359). The Clerk shall file the amended motion for reconsideration (which is attached to the motion to amend) and termin..
More
ORDER
JOSEPH F. ANDERSON, Jr., District Judge.
The defendant has filed a pro se "Motion to Reconsider Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e)." The government is respectfully requested to respond to this motion within thirty days.
The defendant has also filed a motion to amend his motion for reconsideration to correct typographical errors. This motion to amend is granted (ECF No. 359). The Clerk shall file the amended motion for reconsideration (which is attached to the motion to amend) and terminate the earlier motion for reconsideration (ECF No. 358).
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
