U.S. v. CROSS, 12-7800. (2013)
Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Number: infco20130617078
Visitors: 16
Filed: Jun. 17, 2013
Latest Update: Jun. 17, 2013
Summary: UNPUBLISHED Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: William Terrence Cross appeals the district court's margin order denying his motion to correct a clerical error. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court's order. United States v. Cross, No. 2:03-cr-00010-RBS-1 (E.D. Va. Sept. 27, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the mater
Summary: UNPUBLISHED Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: William Terrence Cross appeals the district court's margin order denying his motion to correct a clerical error. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court's order. United States v. Cross, No. 2:03-cr-00010-RBS-1 (E.D. Va. Sept. 27, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materi..
More
UNPUBLISHED
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
William Terrence Cross appeals the district court's margin order denying his motion to correct a clerical error. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court's order. United States v. Cross, No. 2:03-cr-00010-RBS-1 (E.D. Va. Sept. 27, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Source: Leagle
