Grange Mutual Casualty Company v. New Ocean Enterprises, Inc., 2:18-cv-1273. (2020)
Court: District Court, S.D. Ohio
Number: infdco20200115i87
Visitors: 7
Filed: Jan. 13, 2020
Latest Update: Jan. 13, 2020
Summary: OPINION & ORDER SARAH D. MORRISON , District Judge . Plaintiffs Grange Mutual Casualty Company and Kent Finton move the Court under Fed. R. Civ. P. 55(b) for an Entry of Default against Defendant Hong Kong Uni-Sun Technology Limited (ECF No. 25). In support, Plaintiffs offer the affidavit of their attorney, Alessandro Sabatino (ECF No. 25-1). Therein, Attorney Sabatino states that the "claim of the Plaintiff, Grange Mutual Casualty Company, is for the sum of $130,583.50 and the claim of th
Summary: OPINION & ORDER SARAH D. MORRISON , District Judge . Plaintiffs Grange Mutual Casualty Company and Kent Finton move the Court under Fed. R. Civ. P. 55(b) for an Entry of Default against Defendant Hong Kong Uni-Sun Technology Limited (ECF No. 25). In support, Plaintiffs offer the affidavit of their attorney, Alessandro Sabatino (ECF No. 25-1). Therein, Attorney Sabatino states that the "claim of the Plaintiff, Grange Mutual Casualty Company, is for the sum of $130,583.50 and the claim of the..
More
OPINION & ORDER
SARAH D. MORRISON, District Judge.
Plaintiffs Grange Mutual Casualty Company and Kent Finton move the Court under Fed. R. Civ. P. 55(b) for an Entry of Default against Defendant Hong Kong Uni-Sun Technology Limited (ECF No. 25). In support, Plaintiffs offer the affidavit of their attorney, Alessandro Sabatino (ECF No. 25-1). Therein, Attorney Sabatino states that the "claim of the Plaintiff, Grange Mutual Casualty Company, is for the sum of $130,583.50 and the claim of the Plaintiff, Kent Finton, is for the sum of $1,500.00, plus interest from the date of judgment as provided by law, together with the costs of this action." Id. at ¶ 8. This is the only evidence offered regarding damages, and it is insufficient. Accordingly, the Court DENIES Plaintiffs' Motion for Default (ECF No. 25) without prejudice. Plaintiffs may re-file their motion for default that includes adequate supporting evidence.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
