Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

U.S. v. ROJAS-MOLINA, 3:12-CR-076-L. (2012)

Court: District Court, N.D. Texas Number: infdco20120511b10 Visitors: 8
Filed: May 09, 2012
Latest Update: May 09, 2012
Summary: ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE CONCERNING PLEA OF GUILTY SAM A. LINDSAY, District Judge. After reviewing all relevant matters of record, including the Notice Regarding Entry of a Plea of Guilty, the Consent of Defendant, and the Report and Recommendation Concerning Plea of Guilty of the United States Magistrate Judge ("Report"), and no objections thereto having been filed within ten days of service in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1), the
More

ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE CONCERNING PLEA OF GUILTY

SAM A. LINDSAY, District Judge.

After reviewing all relevant matters of record, including the Notice Regarding Entry of a Plea of Guilty, the Consent of Defendant, and the Report and Recommendation Concerning Plea of Guilty of the United States Magistrate Judge ("Report"), and no objections thereto having been filed within ten days of service in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), the undersigned District Judge determines that the Report of the Magistrate Judge concerning the Plea of Guilty should be accepted. Based upon the Report of the Magistrate Judge, the court finds that Defendant is fully competent and capable of entering an informed plea, that she is aware of the nature of the charge and the consequences of the plea, and that her plea of guilty is a knowing and voluntary plea, supported by an independent basis in fact, containing each of the essential elements of the offense. Accordingly, the court accepts the plea of guilty entered by Defendant Maria Rojas-Molina on April 24, 2012, and she is hereby adjudged guilty of the offense charged in Count One of the Superseding Information, which is a violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a) and (b)(2), namely, Illegal Reentry after Removal from the United States. Sentence will be imposed in accordance with the court's scheduling order.

It is so ordered.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer