Filed: Aug. 03, 2004
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: Opinions of the United 2004 Decisions States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 8-3-2004 USA v. Sparrow Precedential or Non-Precedential: Precedential Docket No. 02-3571 Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2004 Recommended Citation "USA v. Sparrow" (2004). 2004 Decisions. Paper 380. http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2004/380 This decision is brought to you for free and open access by the Opinions of the United States Co
Summary: Opinions of the United 2004 Decisions States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 8-3-2004 USA v. Sparrow Precedential or Non-Precedential: Precedential Docket No. 02-3571 Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2004 Recommended Citation "USA v. Sparrow" (2004). 2004 Decisions. Paper 380. http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2004/380 This decision is brought to you for free and open access by the Opinions of the United States Cou..
More
Opinions of the United 2004 Decisions States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 8-3-2004 USA v. Sparrow Precedential or Non-Precedential: Precedential Docket No. 02-3571 Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2004 Recommended Citation "USA v. Sparrow" (2004). 2004 Decisions. Paper 380. http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2004/380 This decision is brought to you for free and open access by the Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit at Villanova University School of Law Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in 2004 Decisions by an authorized administrator of Villanova University School of Law Digital Repository. For more information, please contact Benjamin.Carlson@law.villanova.edu. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT No. 02-3571 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. GAYLORD SPARROW, Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania (D.C. Criminal Action No. 99-cr-00290) District Judge: Honorable Harvey Bartle, III Submitted Under Third Circuit LAR 34.1(a) March 23, 2004 Before: ROTH, AMBRO, and CHERTOFF, Circuit Judges (Opinion filed June 15, 2004) Stephen J. Binhak, Esq. 3103 Philmont Avenue Huntingdon Valley, PA 19006 Attorney for Appellant Patrick L. Meehan United States Attorney Laurie Magid Deputy United States Attorney Emily McKillip Assistant United States Attorney Judy Goldstein Smith Assistant United States Attorney 615 Chestnut Street Philadelphia, PA 19106 Attorneys for Appellee ORDER AMENDING PUBLISHED OPINION AM BRO, Circuit Judge It is now ordered that the published Opinion in the above case filed June 15, 2004, be amended as follows: On page three, in footnote 3, second line, delete the hyphen (– ) between the words “opinion” and “United”, and replace it with a period, followed by two spaces, the word “See” and a space. The lines should read, “We did address it, however, in a not precedential opinion. See United States v. Morgan, 33 Fed. Appx. 603 (3d Cir. 2002).” By the Court, /s/ Thomas L. Ambro, Circuit Judge Dated: August 3, 2004 2