Howard v. Rogers, 4:18-cv-4126. (2020)
Court: District Court, W.D. Arkansas
Number: infdco20200220880
Visitors: 18
Filed: Feb. 19, 2020
Latest Update: Feb. 19, 2020
Summary: ORDER SUSAN O. HICKEY , Chief District Judge . Before the Court is the Report and Recommendation filed January 28, 2020, by the Honorable Barry A. Bryant, United States Magistrate Judge for the Western District of Arkansas. (ECF No. 46). Judge Bryant recommends that Defendant Rogers' Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 38) be denied. The Court finds this matter ripe for consideration. No objections to the Report and Recommendation have been filed, and the time to object has passed. See
Summary: ORDER SUSAN O. HICKEY , Chief District Judge . Before the Court is the Report and Recommendation filed January 28, 2020, by the Honorable Barry A. Bryant, United States Magistrate Judge for the Western District of Arkansas. (ECF No. 46). Judge Bryant recommends that Defendant Rogers' Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 38) be denied. The Court finds this matter ripe for consideration. No objections to the Report and Recommendation have been filed, and the time to object has passed. See ..
More
ORDER
SUSAN O. HICKEY, Chief District Judge.
Before the Court is the Report and Recommendation filed January 28, 2020, by the Honorable Barry A. Bryant, United States Magistrate Judge for the Western District of Arkansas. (ECF No. 46). Judge Bryant recommends that Defendant Rogers' Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 38) be denied. The Court finds this matter ripe for consideration.
No objections to the Report and Recommendation have been filed, and the time to object has passed. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Upon review, the Court finds no clear error in the Report and Recommendation and adopts the Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 46) in toto. Accordingly, Defendant Rogers' Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 38) should be and hereby is DENIED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
