Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Alverto v. Obenland, 3:13-cv-5490 RJB-DWC. (2017)

Court: District Court, D. Washington Number: infdco20170925770 Visitors: 14
Filed: Aug. 25, 2017
Latest Update: Aug. 25, 2017
Summary: REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION Noted for: September 15, 2017 DAVID W. CHRISTEL , Magistrate Judge . Petitioner Jerome Ceasar Alverto requests that this Court dismiss his currently stayed habeas corpus petition without prejudice in light of several state court actions currently pending in Washington state courts. Dkt. 73. Respondent is not opposed to the dismissal. Dkt. 74. DISCUSSION A petitioner may voluntarily dismiss an action without leave of court before service by the adverse party of a
More

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Noted for: September 15, 2017

Petitioner Jerome Ceasar Alverto requests that this Court dismiss his currently stayed habeas corpus petition without prejudice in light of several state court actions currently pending in Washington state courts. Dkt. 73. Respondent is not opposed to the dismissal. Dkt. 74.

DISCUSSION

A petitioner may voluntarily dismiss an action without leave of court before service by the adverse party of an answer or motion for summary judgment. Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a). Otherwise, an action shall not be dismissed except upon order of the court and upon such terms and conditions as the court deems proper. Id. This action has been stayed since August 19, 2013 to allow petitioner an opportunity to exhaust his state court remedies. Dkt. 22. Respondent has not filed an answer or motion to dismiss. In addition, Respondent does not oppose the dismissal without prejudice. Dkt. 74.

CONCLUSION

Based on the foregoing, the undersigned recommends that the Court grant petitioner's motion to voluntarily dismiss his petition without prejudice.

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b), the parties shall have fourteen (14) days from service of this Report and Recommendation to file written objections. See also Fed. R. Civ. P. 6. Failure to file objections will result in a waiver of those objections for purposes of appeal. Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140 (1985). Accommodating the time limit imposed by Rule 72(b), the Clerk is directed to set the matter for consideration on September 15, 2017, as noted in the caption.

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

The Court, having reviewed the petition for writ of habeas corpus, the response, the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge David W. Christel, objections to the Report and Recommendation, if any, and the remaining record, does hereby find and ORDER:

(1) The Court adopts the Report and Recommendation. (2) Petitioner's motion to withdraw his habeas petition (Dkt. 73) is GRANTED; the habeas petition is dismissed without prejudice. (3) The Clerk is directed to send copies of this Order to Petitioner, counsel for Respondent and to Judge Christel.
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer