IN RE McADOO, 04-16-00618-CV. (2016)
Court: Court of Appeals of Texas
Number: intxco20161018688
Visitors: 6
Filed: Oct. 17, 2016
Latest Update: Oct. 17, 2016
Summary: ORDER KAREN ANGELINI , Justice . The court has considered relator's petition for a writ of mandamus and the response filed by the real-parties-in-interest and is of the opinion that relator is not entitled to mandamus relief. Accordingly, the petition for a writ of mandamus is DENIED. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a). Relator's motion for stay of the trial court's amended order is DENIED. The court's opinion will issue at a later date. It is so ORDERED. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto
Summary: ORDER KAREN ANGELINI , Justice . The court has considered relator's petition for a writ of mandamus and the response filed by the real-parties-in-interest and is of the opinion that relator is not entitled to mandamus relief. Accordingly, the petition for a writ of mandamus is DENIED. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a). Relator's motion for stay of the trial court's amended order is DENIED. The court's opinion will issue at a later date. It is so ORDERED. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto s..
More
ORDER
KAREN ANGELINI, Justice.
The court has considered relator's petition for a writ of mandamus and the response filed by the real-parties-in-interest and is of the opinion that relator is not entitled to mandamus relief. Accordingly, the petition for a writ of mandamus is DENIED. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a). Relator's motion for stay of the trial court's amended order is DENIED. The court's opinion will issue at a later date.
It is so ORDERED.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 17th day of October, 2016.
Source: Leagle
