U.S. v. HASKINS, 12-6551. (2012)
Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Number: infco20120626146
Visitors: 2
Filed: Jun. 26, 2012
Latest Update: Jun. 26, 2012
Summary: Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: William Haskins pled guilty to three counts of distributing crack and one count of aiding and abetting the distribution of crack and was sentenced to 420 months of imprisonment. His sentence was affirmed on appeal. United States v. Haskins, No. 96-4154, 1998 WL 393990 (4th Cir. 1998). Haskins recently filed a second notice of appeal from his criminal judgment, which was entered in 1996. To the extent that Haskins se
Summary: Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: William Haskins pled guilty to three counts of distributing crack and one count of aiding and abetting the distribution of crack and was sentenced to 420 months of imprisonment. His sentence was affirmed on appeal. United States v. Haskins, No. 96-4154, 1998 WL 393990 (4th Cir. 1998). Haskins recently filed a second notice of appeal from his criminal judgment, which was entered in 1996. To the extent that Haskins see..
More
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
William Haskins pled guilty to three counts of distributing crack and one count of aiding and abetting the distribution of crack and was sentenced to 420 months of imprisonment. His sentence was affirmed on appeal. United States v. Haskins, No. 96-4154, 1998 WL 393990 (4th Cir. 1998). Haskins recently filed a second notice of appeal from his criminal judgment, which was entered in 1996. To the extent that Haskins seeks to appeal this judgment a second time, we dismiss the appeal as duplicative and untimely. To the extent that Haskins seeks to appeal the district court's expected ruling on his recent letter to the court, construed by the court as a motion under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006), we dismiss the appeal as interlocutory. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED.
Source: Leagle
