Filed: Apr. 12, 2016
Latest Update: Apr. 12, 2016
Summary: ORDER OF DISMISSAL MICHAEL H. SCHNEIDER , District Judge . Petitioner Ronnie Alan Montalbano, a prisoner confined in the Texas prison system, filed the above-styled and numbered petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2254. The petition was referred to United States Magistrate Judge John D. Love, who issued a Report and Recommendation concluding that the petition should be denied. Petitioner has filed objections. The Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, w
Summary: ORDER OF DISMISSAL MICHAEL H. SCHNEIDER , District Judge . Petitioner Ronnie Alan Montalbano, a prisoner confined in the Texas prison system, filed the above-styled and numbered petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2254. The petition was referred to United States Magistrate Judge John D. Love, who issued a Report and Recommendation concluding that the petition should be denied. Petitioner has filed objections. The Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, wh..
More
ORDER OF DISMISSAL
MICHAEL H. SCHNEIDER, District Judge.
Petitioner Ronnie Alan Montalbano, a prisoner confined in the Texas prison system, filed the above-styled and numbered petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The petition was referred to United States Magistrate Judge John D. Love, who issued a Report and Recommendation concluding that the petition should be denied. Petitioner has filed objections.
The Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, which contain his proposed findings of fact and recommendations for the disposition of such action, has been presented for consideration, and having made a de novo review of the objections raised by Petitioner, the Court is of the opinion that the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct. It is specifically noted that Petitioner relies on Martinez v. Ryan, 132 S.Ct. 1309 (2012), and Trevino v. Thaler, 133 S.Ct. 1911 (2013), in an effort to save his first ground for relief, but these cases have no applicability to his first claim. Petitioner's objections lack merit. Therefore the Court hereby adopts the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge as the findings and conclusions of the Court. It is accordingly
ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation (doc. #19) is ADOPTED. It is further
ORDERED that the petition for a writ of habeas corpus is DENIED and the case is DISMISSED with prejudice. It is further
ORDERED that a certificate of appealability is DENIED. It is finally
ORDERED that all motions not previously ruled on are DENIED.
It is SO ORDERED.