Moi v. Chihuly Studio, Inc., 2:17-cv-00853-RSL. (2019)
Court: District Court, D. Washington
Number: infdco20190621e52
Visitors: 7
Filed: Jun. 20, 2019
Latest Update: Jun. 20, 2019
Summary: ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO SEAL SUPPLEMENTAL REPLY ROBERT S. LASNIK , District Judge . This matter came before the Court on Defendants' "Motion to File Documents Under Seal (Supplemental Reply in Support of Motion for Protective Order)." Dkt. # 100. The motion is unopposed. Having considered the motion and the underlying motion for protective order, the Court finds as follows: 1. The good cause standard applies to the sealing of the Supplement Reply because the motion for protect
Summary: ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO SEAL SUPPLEMENTAL REPLY ROBERT S. LASNIK , District Judge . This matter came before the Court on Defendants' "Motion to File Documents Under Seal (Supplemental Reply in Support of Motion for Protective Order)." Dkt. # 100. The motion is unopposed. Having considered the motion and the underlying motion for protective order, the Court finds as follows: 1. The good cause standard applies to the sealing of the Supplement Reply because the motion for protecti..
More
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO SEAL SUPPLEMENTAL REPLY
ROBERT S. LASNIK, District Judge.
This matter came before the Court on Defendants' "Motion to File Documents Under Seal (Supplemental Reply in Support of Motion for Protective Order)." Dkt. # 100. The motion is unopposed. Having considered the motion and the underlying motion for protective order, the Court finds as follows:
1. The good cause standard applies to the sealing of the Supplement Reply because the motion for protective order is not dispositive; and
2. Good cause exists to seal the Supplemental Reply. Although mere mention of the existence of confidential agreements with third parties would not justify a seal, most of the information that has been redacted from the Supplemental Reply relates to attorney-client communications and/or the terms of the confidential agreements.
The Motion to Seal is GRANTED. The following document shall remain under seal until further order of the Court:
• Supplemental Reply (Dkt. # 102).
A publicly-available redacted version of this document is in the record at Dkt. # 101.
Source: Leagle
