Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

U.S. v. Byrd, 4:17-cr-209-O. (2019)

Court: District Court, N.D. Texas Number: infdco20190227h77 Visitors: 6
Filed: Feb. 26, 2019
Latest Update: Feb. 26, 2019
Summary: ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE REED O'CONNOR , District Judge . The United States Magistrate Judge has entered his Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation. ECF No. 27. Neither party has filed objections to the Recommendation. The Magistrate Judge recommends that Defendant Byrd's Motion to Enter Nunc Pro Tunc Order (ECF No. 22) be denied as moot. The District Court has reviewed the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation f
More

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

The United States Magistrate Judge has entered his Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation. ECF No. 27. Neither party has filed objections to the Recommendation. The Magistrate Judge recommends that Defendant Byrd's Motion to Enter Nunc Pro Tunc Order (ECF No. 22) be denied as moot. The District Court has reviewed the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation for plain error. Finding no error, I am of the opinion that the findings of fact, conclusions of law, and reasons for denial set forth in the Magistrate Judge's Recommendation are correct and they are hereby adopted and incorporated by reference as the Findings of the Court

For the foregoing reasons, the Motion to Enter Nunc Pro Tunc Order (ECF No. 22) is DENIED as MOOT.

SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer