Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Rhonda H. v. Commissioner of Social Security, 2:19-CV-328-RMP. (2019)

Court: District Court, D. Washington Number: infdco20191122f72 Visitors: 23
Filed: Nov. 21, 2019
Latest Update: Nov. 21, 2019
Summary: ORDER ADOPTING THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION AND DISMISSING COMPLAINT WITHOUT PREJUDICE ROSANNA MALOUF PETERSON , District Judge . On September 30, 2019, Magistrate Judge Mary K. Dimke denied pro se Plaintiff Rhonda H.'s 1 application to proceed in forma pauperis, with leave to amend and renew the application. ECF No. 5. Plaintiff had thirty days to either renew her application to proceed in forma pauperis or pay the filing fee. On November 4, 2019, Magistrate Judge John T. Rodgers
More

ORDER ADOPTING THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION AND DISMISSING COMPLAINT WITHOUT PREJUDICE

On September 30, 2019, Magistrate Judge Mary K. Dimke denied pro se Plaintiff Rhonda H.'s1 application to proceed in forma pauperis, with leave to amend and renew the application. ECF No. 5. Plaintiff had thirty days to either renew her application to proceed in forma pauperis or pay the filing fee.

On November 4, 2019, Magistrate Judge John T. Rodgers entered a Report and Recommendation in this matter. ECF No. 7. Magistrate Judge Rodgers reported that Plaintiff failed to pay the filing fee or amend her application to proceed in forma pauperis within the required thirty-day period. ECF No. 7. Upon an independent review of the record, this Court agrees and finds that Plaintiff failed to comply with Magistrate Judge Dimke's order. Plaintiff filed no objections or response to Magistrate Judge Rodgers' Report and Recommendation,

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED:

1. The Report and Recommendation, ECF No. 7, is adopted in its entirety. 2. Plaintiff's Complaint is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.

IT IS SO ORDERED. The District Court Clerk is directed to enter this Order, enter a judgment of dismissal without prejudice, provide copies to pro se Plaintiff and to counsel, and close this case.

FootNotes


1. In the interest of protecting Plaintiff's privacy, the Court will use Plaintiff's first name and last initial, and, subsequently, Plaintiff's first name only, throughout this decision.
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer