Killam v. O'Reilly Auto Enterprises, LLC, 2:17-cv-00841-RSM. (2017)
Court: District Court, D. Washington
Number: infdco20170710e84
Visitors: 10
Filed: Jul. 07, 2017
Latest Update: Jul. 07, 2017
Summary: STIPULATED MOTION AND ORDER FOR STAY PENDING POTENTIAL RESOLUTION RICARDO S. MARTINEZ , Chief District Judge . I. STIPULATION The parties, by and through their counsel, hereby move the Court to enter an order staying all deadlines for 60 days. Counsel for all parties have discussed this matter, and all parties stipulate that good cause exists, under both Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 16(b)(2) and LCR 10(g), to stay all deadlines including the deadline to answer the complaint for 60 days
Summary: STIPULATED MOTION AND ORDER FOR STAY PENDING POTENTIAL RESOLUTION RICARDO S. MARTINEZ , Chief District Judge . I. STIPULATION The parties, by and through their counsel, hereby move the Court to enter an order staying all deadlines for 60 days. Counsel for all parties have discussed this matter, and all parties stipulate that good cause exists, under both Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 16(b)(2) and LCR 10(g), to stay all deadlines including the deadline to answer the complaint for 60 days p..
More
STIPULATED MOTION AND ORDER FOR STAY PENDING POTENTIAL RESOLUTION
RICARDO S. MARTINEZ, Chief District Judge.
I. STIPULATION
The parties, by and through their counsel, hereby move the Court to enter an order staying all deadlines for 60 days. Counsel for all parties have discussed this matter, and all parties stipulate that good cause exists, under both Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 16(b)(2) and LCR 10(g), to stay all deadlines including the deadline to answer the complaint for 60 days pending potential resolution. An agreement in principle has been reached pending documentation with a formal agreement between the parties.
II. ORDER
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
