Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Saudi Basic Ind v. Exxon Corp, 02-2130 (2004)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit Number: 02-2130 Visitors: 8
Filed: Apr. 27, 2004
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: Opinions of the United 2004 Decisions States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 4-27-2004 Saudi Basic Ind v. Exxon Corp Precedential or Non-Precedential: Precedential Docket No. 02-2130 Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2004 Recommended Citation "Saudi Basic Ind v. Exxon Corp" (2004). 2004 Decisions. Paper 738. http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2004/738 This decision is brought to you for free and open access by the O
More
Opinions of the United 2004 Decisions States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 4-27-2004 Saudi Basic Ind v. Exxon Corp Precedential or Non-Precedential: Precedential Docket No. 02-2130 Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2004 Recommended Citation "Saudi Basic Ind v. Exxon Corp" (2004). 2004 Decisions. Paper 738. http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2004/738 This decision is brought to you for free and open access by the Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit at Villanova University School of Law Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in 2004 Decisions by an authorized administrator of Villanova University School of Law Digital Repository. For more information, please contact Benjamin.Carlson@law.villanova.edu. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT No. 02-2130 EXXON MOBIL CORPORATION; EXXON CHEMICAL ARABIA, INC.; MOBIL YANBU PETROCHEMICAL COMPANY, INC. v. SAUDI BASIC INDUSTRIES CORPORATION, Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey (D.C. Civil Action No. 00-cv-03841) District Judge: Honorable William H. Walls Argued December 9, 2003 Before: AMBRO, FUENTES and CHERTOFF, Circuit Judges ORDER AMENDING PUBLISHED OPINION AM BRO, Circuit Judge It is now ordered that the published Opinion in the above case filed March 24, 2004, be amended as follows: On page 5, in the left column, before the Lubrizol citation, delete the words “wholly-owned” so that the sentence reads, “Claims and issues decided against an entity bind also its parties in privity, including subsidiaries.” By the Court, /s/ Thomas L. Ambro Circuit Judge Dated: April 27, 2004 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer