Filed: Apr. 19, 2004
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: Opinions of the United 2004 Decisions States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 4-19-2004 USA v. German Precedential or Non-Precedential: Non-Precedential Docket No. 03-3420 Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2004 Recommended Citation "USA v. German" (2004). 2004 Decisions. Paper 810. http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2004/810 This decision is brought to you for free and open access by the Opinions of the United States
Summary: Opinions of the United 2004 Decisions States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 4-19-2004 USA v. German Precedential or Non-Precedential: Non-Precedential Docket No. 03-3420 Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2004 Recommended Citation "USA v. German" (2004). 2004 Decisions. Paper 810. http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2004/810 This decision is brought to you for free and open access by the Opinions of the United States ..
More
Opinions of the United
2004 Decisions States Court of Appeals
for the Third Circuit
4-19-2004
USA v. German
Precedential or Non-Precedential: Non-Precedential
Docket No. 03-3420
Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2004
Recommended Citation
"USA v. German" (2004). 2004 Decisions. Paper 810.
http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2004/810
This decision is brought to you for free and open access by the Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit at Villanova
University School of Law Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in 2004 Decisions by an authorized administrator of Villanova
University School of Law Digital Repository. For more information, please contact Benjamin.Carlson@law.villanova.edu.
NOT PRECEDENTIAL
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT
NO. 03-3420
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
v.
RAFAEL GERMAN
Appellant
On Appeal From the United States District Court
For the District of New Jersey
(D.C. Crim. Action No. 02-cr-00879-1)
District Judge: Hon. John W. Bissell
Submitted Pursuant to Third Circuit LAR 34.1(a)
April 15, 2004
BEFORE: RENDELL, STAPLETON, and LAY,* Circuit Judges
(Filed: April 19, 2004)
OPINION OF THE COURT
* Hon. Donald P. Lay, United States Circuit Judge for the Eighth Circuit, sitting by
designation.
STAPLETON, Circuit Judge:
Appellant Rafael German pled guilty, pursuant to a plea agreement, to
conspiracy to distribute, and possess with intent to distribute, more than 500 grams of
cocaine. He was sentenced to 70 months of imprisonment.
German argues that the District Court erred in sentencing him for between
five and fifteen kilograms of cocaine. However, in his plea agreement German agreed to
stipulate as follows at sentencing:
The applicable guideline is § 2D1.1. This guideline
carries a Base Offense Level of thirty-two, pursuant to §
2D1.1(a)(3) and (c)(4), because the offense involved at least
five kilograms but less than fifteen kilograms of cocaine.
Appellee’s Supp. App. at 6.
Moreover, even if German were permitted to challenge the stipulated drug
quantity, the District Court would not have been clearly erroneous in finding that German
was responsible for between five and fifteen kilograms of cocaine. He and his co-
conspirators agreed to sell seven kilograms of cocaine to an undercover officer, and the
two kilograms that were actually delivered represented the first of three installments in
the drug deal. As German’s Pre-Sentence Report noted, “[a]ll the other defendants
agreed that the object of this conspiracy was for the distribution of seven kilograms of
cocaine.” PSR at 20; see also PSR at ¶ 23 (“German agreed to provide Rodriguez with
the cocaine in installments. He would first give him two kilograms, then another two
kilograms and finally three kilograms.”).
2
The judgment of the District Court will be affirmed.
3