Homesite Insurance Company of the Midwest v. Ascolese, 2:17-cv-01323-RSM. (2018)
Court: District Court, D. Washington
Number: infdco20180719f21
Visitors: 5
Filed: Jul. 18, 2018
Latest Update: Jul. 18, 2018
Summary: ORDER GRANTING STIPULATED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR DEADLINES ON ORDER SETTING TRIAL DATE AND RELATED DATES RICARDO S. MARTINEZ , Chief District Judge . This matter comes before the Court on the parties' stipulation to extend deadlines in the Court's Order Setting Trial Date and Related Dates (Dkt. #15) by 60 days. Dkt. #25. The parties request extension of certain deadlines based on settlement negotiations and the upcoming trial date in the underlying action. Id. Based on the part
Summary: ORDER GRANTING STIPULATED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR DEADLINES ON ORDER SETTING TRIAL DATE AND RELATED DATES RICARDO S. MARTINEZ , Chief District Judge . This matter comes before the Court on the parties' stipulation to extend deadlines in the Court's Order Setting Trial Date and Related Dates (Dkt. #15) by 60 days. Dkt. #25. The parties request extension of certain deadlines based on settlement negotiations and the upcoming trial date in the underlying action. Id. Based on the parti..
More
ORDER GRANTING STIPULATED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR DEADLINES ON ORDER SETTING TRIAL DATE AND RELATED DATES
RICARDO S. MARTINEZ, Chief District Judge.
This matter comes before the Court on the parties' stipulation to extend deadlines in the Court's Order Setting Trial Date and Related Dates (Dkt. #15) by 60 days. Dkt. #25. The parties request extension of certain deadlines based on settlement negotiations and the upcoming trial date in the underlying action. Id. Based on the parties' stipulation, the Court hereby ORDERS that the deadlines set forth in Dkt. #15 will be extended by 60 days. Because the extension of these deadlines alone would not permit the Court to resolve any dispositive motion before trial, and based on the above information, the Court also ORDERS that the trial date be continued 60 days. The clerk is directed to issue a revised case scheduling order consistent with the above.
Source: Leagle
