WILLIAMS v. DAVIS, 3:16-CV-1923-D. (2016)
Court: District Court, N.D. Texas
Number: infdco20161230e82
Visitors: 25
Filed: Dec. 29, 2016
Latest Update: Dec. 29, 2016
Summary: ORDER SIDNEY A. FITZWATER , District Judge . After reviewing all relevant matters of record in this case, including the findings, conclusions, and recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge and petitioner's objections, in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1), the court is of the opinion that the findings and conclusions of the magistrate judge are correct and they are adopted as the findings and conclusions of the court. For the reasons stated in the findings, conclusions, and r
Summary: ORDER SIDNEY A. FITZWATER , District Judge . After reviewing all relevant matters of record in this case, including the findings, conclusions, and recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge and petitioner's objections, in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1), the court is of the opinion that the findings and conclusions of the magistrate judge are correct and they are adopted as the findings and conclusions of the court. For the reasons stated in the findings, conclusions, and re..
More
ORDER
SIDNEY A. FITZWATER, District Judge.
After reviewing all relevant matters of record in this case, including the findings, conclusions, and recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge and petitioner's objections, in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), the court is of the opinion that the findings and conclusions of the magistrate judge are correct and they are adopted as the findings and conclusions of the court. For the reasons stated in the findings, conclusions, and recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge, petitioner's application for default judgment, received on December 12, 2016, is denied.
SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
