NORMAN v. PINKERTON PROPERTIES, 02-18-00251-CV. (2019)
Court: Court of Appeals of Texas
Number: intxco20190208a39
Visitors: 4
Filed: Feb. 07, 2019
Latest Update: Feb. 07, 2019
Summary: MEMORANDUM OPINION AND JUDGMENT PER CURIAM . On January 4, 2019, we notified appellant that her brief had not been filed as the appellate rules require. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.6(a). We stated that we could dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution unless, within ten days, appellant filed with the court an appellant's brief and an accompanying motion reasonably explaining the brief's untimely filing and why an extension was needed. See Tex. R. App. P. 10.5(b), 38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b). We hav
Summary: MEMORANDUM OPINION AND JUDGMENT PER CURIAM . On January 4, 2019, we notified appellant that her brief had not been filed as the appellate rules require. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.6(a). We stated that we could dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution unless, within ten days, appellant filed with the court an appellant's brief and an accompanying motion reasonably explaining the brief's untimely filing and why an extension was needed. See Tex. R. App. P. 10.5(b), 38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b). We have..
More
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND JUDGMENT
PER CURIAM.
On January 4, 2019, we notified appellant that her brief had not been filed as the appellate rules require. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.6(a). We stated that we could dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution unless, within ten days, appellant filed with the court an appellant's brief and an accompanying motion reasonably explaining the brief's untimely filing and why an extension was needed. See Tex. R. App. P. 10.5(b), 38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b). We have received no response.
Because appellant has failed to file a brief despite the opportunity to explain the initial failure, we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b), 43.2(f).
Source: Leagle
