U.S. v. WILLIAMS, 16-7134. (2017)
Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Number: infco20170111098
Visitors: 21
Filed: Jan. 11, 2017
Latest Update: Jan. 11, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM . Michael E. Williams appeals the district court's order granting his 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Williams, No. 3:03-cr-00344-HEH-1 (E.D. Va. Aug. 10, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presen
Summary: UNPUBLISHED Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM . Michael E. Williams appeals the district court's order granting his 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Williams, No. 3:03-cr-00344-HEH-1 (E.D. Va. Aug. 10, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately present..
More
UNPUBLISHED
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM.
Michael E. Williams appeals the district court's order granting his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Williams, No. 3:03-cr-00344-HEH-1 (E.D. Va. Aug. 10, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Source: Leagle
