Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

DURBIN v. COLVIN, C15-1756-RSM-JPD. (2015)

Court: District Court, D. Washington Number: infdco20151207g47 Visitors: 3
Filed: Nov. 19, 2015
Latest Update: Nov. 19, 2015
Summary: REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION JAMES P. DONOHUE , Chief Magistrate Judge . This matter comes before the Court upon plaintiff's application to proceed in forma pauperis ("IFP") in the above-entitled action. Dkt. 1. Specifically, plaintiff's IFP application indicates that her spouse is currently employed with a net monthly income is $4,650. Id. at 1. They also have additional income from their IRA, as well as disability, unemployment, workers compensation or public assistance. Id. Plaintiff
More

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

This matter comes before the Court upon plaintiff's application to proceed in forma pauperis ("IFP") in the above-entitled action. Dkt. 1. Specifically, plaintiff's IFP application indicates that her spouse is currently employed with a net monthly income is $4,650. Id. at 1. They also have additional income from their IRA, as well as disability, unemployment, workers compensation or public assistance. Id. Plaintiff and her spouse own a home with significant equity of $90,000, and represent that they have $3,000 in their checking account at this time. Id. at 2.

After careful consideration of plaintiff's IFP application, the governing law, and the balance of the record, the Court recommends DENYING plaintiff's application to proceed IFP (Dkt. 1) and directing her to pay the $400 filing fee within thirty (30) days of the date of the Order adopting this Report and Recommendation. Plaintiff is advised that failure to pay this filing fee will result in dismissal of this action.

The Clerk of the Court is directed to send copies of this Report and Recommendation to the plaintiff and to the Honorable Ricardo S. Martinez.

Objections to this Report and Recommendation, if any, should be filed with the Clerk and served upon all parties to this suit by no later than December 3, 2015. Failure to file objections within the specified time may affect your right to appeal. Objections should be noted for consideration on the District Judge's motion calendar for the third Friday after they are filed. Responses to objections may be filed within fourteen (14) days after service of objections. If no timely objections are filed, the matter will be ready for consideration by the District Judge on December 4, 2015.

This Report and Recommendation is not an appealable order. Thus, a notice of appeal seeking review in the Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit should not be filed until the assigned District Judge acts on this Report and Recommendation.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer