Singh v. Federal Aviation Administration, C17-822 RAJ. (2018)
Court: District Court, D. Washington
Number: infdco20180320f78
Visitors: 5
Filed: Mar. 19, 2018
Latest Update: Mar. 19, 2018
Summary: ORDER RICHARD A. JONES , District Judge . The court has reviewed Plaintiff's motion for reconsideration. Dkt. # 37. Pursuant to Local Rules W.D. Wash. CR 7(h)(1), motions for reconsideration are disfavored, and will ordinarily be denied unless there is a showing of (a) manifest error in the prior ruling, or (b) facts or legal authority which could not have been brought to the attention of the court earlier, through reasonable diligence. The sole basis for reconsideration is Plaintiff's disa
Summary: ORDER RICHARD A. JONES , District Judge . The court has reviewed Plaintiff's motion for reconsideration. Dkt. # 37. Pursuant to Local Rules W.D. Wash. CR 7(h)(1), motions for reconsideration are disfavored, and will ordinarily be denied unless there is a showing of (a) manifest error in the prior ruling, or (b) facts or legal authority which could not have been brought to the attention of the court earlier, through reasonable diligence. The sole basis for reconsideration is Plaintiff's disag..
More
ORDER
RICHARD A. JONES, District Judge.
The court has reviewed Plaintiff's motion for reconsideration. Dkt. # 37. Pursuant to Local Rules W.D. Wash. CR 7(h)(1), motions for reconsideration are disfavored, and will ordinarily be denied unless there is a showing of (a) manifest error in the prior ruling, or (b) facts or legal authority which could not have been brought to the attention of the court earlier, through reasonable diligence. The sole basis for reconsideration is Plaintiff's disagreement with the Court's prior conclusion; Plaintiff does not present new evidence or authority that was not previously available. For this reason Plaintiff did not carry his burden on the motion. Plaintiff's motion for reconsideration is therefore DENIED.
Source: Leagle
