Ryan R. v. Commissioner of Social Security, C19-5414 TLF. (2019)
Court: District Court, D. Washington
Number: infdco20191203h65
Visitors: 19
Filed: Dec. 02, 2019
Latest Update: Dec. 02, 2019
Summary: ORDER GRANTING STIPULATED MOTION TO REMAND DEFENDANT'S DECISION TO DENY BENEFITS THERESA L. FRICKE , Magistrate Judge . Based on the stipulation of the parties (Dkt. 19), it is ORDERED that the Commissioner's decision regarding plaintiff's applications for Social Security Disability Insurance benefits and Supplemental Security Income disability benefits, under Titles II and XVI of the Social Security Act, is reversed and remanded for further administrative proceedings, pursuant to sentence
Summary: ORDER GRANTING STIPULATED MOTION TO REMAND DEFENDANT'S DECISION TO DENY BENEFITS THERESA L. FRICKE , Magistrate Judge . Based on the stipulation of the parties (Dkt. 19), it is ORDERED that the Commissioner's decision regarding plaintiff's applications for Social Security Disability Insurance benefits and Supplemental Security Income disability benefits, under Titles II and XVI of the Social Security Act, is reversed and remanded for further administrative proceedings, pursuant to sentence f..
More
ORDER GRANTING STIPULATED MOTION TO REMAND DEFENDANT'S DECISION TO DENY BENEFITS
THERESA L. FRICKE, Magistrate Judge.
Based on the stipulation of the parties (Dkt. 19), it is ORDERED that the Commissioner's decision regarding plaintiff's applications for Social Security Disability Insurance benefits and Supplemental Security Income disability benefits, under Titles II and XVI of the Social Security Act, is reversed and remanded for further administrative proceedings, pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. §405(g).
On remand, the Administrative Law Judge shall:
• evaluate the evidence submitted to the Appeals Council;
• further develop the record by obtaining medical expert evidence from a psychologist;
• reconsider the claimant's residual functional capacity;
• obtain supplemental evidence from a vocational expert and clarify any conflicts between the testimony of the vocational expert and the Dictionary of Occupational Titles;
• offer the claimant a de novo supplemental hearing; and
• issue a new decision.
Upon proper presentation, this Court will consider plaintiff's application for cost and attorney's fees under 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d).
Source: Leagle
