Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Jiang v. Atty Gen USA, 04-2920 (2005)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit Number: 04-2920 Visitors: 9
Filed: Dec. 28, 2005
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: Opinions of the United 2005 Decisions States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 12-28-2005 Jiang v. Atty Gen USA Precedential or Non-Precedential: Non-Precedential Docket No. 04-2920 Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2005 Recommended Citation "Jiang v. Atty Gen USA" (2005). 2005 Decisions. Paper 43. http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2005/43 This decision is brought to you for free and open access by the Opinions of th
More
Opinions of the United 2005 Decisions States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 12-28-2005 Jiang v. Atty Gen USA Precedential or Non-Precedential: Non-Precedential Docket No. 04-2920 Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2005 Recommended Citation "Jiang v. Atty Gen USA" (2005). 2005 Decisions. Paper 43. http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2005/43 This decision is brought to you for free and open access by the Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit at Villanova University School of Law Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in 2005 Decisions by an authorized administrator of Villanova University School of Law Digital Repository. For more information, please contact Benjamin.Carlson@law.villanova.edu. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT __________ No. 04-2920 __________ AI XUN JIANG, Petitioner, vs. Attorney General of the United States, Respondent. On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals U.S. Department of Justice, Executive Office for Immigration Review (BIA No. A78 726 602) and an Order of Immigration Judge Donald V. Ferlise __________ Submitted Under Third Circuit L.A.R. 34.1(a) November 8, 2005 ___________ Before: ROTH, FUENTES, and GARTH, Circuit Judges __________ ORDER We hereby amend the opinion in the above-captioned case that was filed on December 27, 2005 so that the phrase “see footnote 5 ” at lines 6-7 on page 11 is changed to read “see footnote 4.” By the Court, /s/ Leonard I. Garth Circuit Judge Dated: December 28, 2005
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer