Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

JACOBSEN v. BANK OF AMERICA, 4:12cv116. (2012)

Court: District Court, E.D. Texas Number: infdco20120611927 Visitors: 9
Filed: Jun. 07, 2012
Latest Update: Jun. 07, 2012
Summary: MEMORANDUM ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE AND ORDER DISMISSING CASE RICHARD A. SCHELL, Judge. Came on for consideration the report of the United States Magistrate Judge in this action, this matter having been heretofore referred to the United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636. On March 6, 2012, the report of the Magistrate Judge was entered containing proposed findings of fact and recommendations that Pro Se Plaintiffs' Emergency
More

MEMORANDUM ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE AND ORDER DISMISSING CASE

RICHARD A. SCHELL, Judge.

Came on for consideration the report of the United States Magistrate Judge in this action, this matter having been heretofore referred to the United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636. On March 6, 2012, the report of the Magistrate Judge was entered containing proposed findings of fact and recommendations that Pro Se Plaintiffs' Emergency Motion for a Temporary Restraining Order (Dkt. 6) be DENIED.

Having received the report of the United States Magistrate Judge, and no objections thereto having been timely filed, this court is of the opinion that the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct and adopts the Magistrate Judge's report as the findings and conclusions of the court. Therefore, Pro Se Plaintiffs' Emergency Motion for a Temporary Restraining Order (Dkt. 6) is DENIED.

Moreover, since the entry of the report and recommendations, Pro Se Plaintiffs have filed a Notice of Dismissal Without Prejudice in accordance with Rule 41 (see Dkt. 20). There being no objection to such notice and in accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41, all claims and causes of action asserted herein by Plaintiffs are hereby DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.

The matter shall be closed on the court's docket, and all costs shall be borne by the party incurring same.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer