U.S. v. HENDERSON, 9:01CR12-1. (2016)
Court: District Court, E.D. Texas
Number: infdco20160121b97
Visitors: 12
Filed: Jan. 20, 2016
Latest Update: Jan. 20, 2016
Summary: ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE THAD HEARTFIELD , District Judge . The above-entitled and numbered criminal action was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(3). The Report and Recommendation on Revocation of Supervised Release, filed on January 14, 2016, has been presented for consideration. The parties waived any objections to the Report and Recommendation. Defendant consented to the revocation of his s
Summary: ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE THAD HEARTFIELD , District Judge . The above-entitled and numbered criminal action was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(3). The Report and Recommendation on Revocation of Supervised Release, filed on January 14, 2016, has been presented for consideration. The parties waived any objections to the Report and Recommendation. Defendant consented to the revocation of his su..
More
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
THAD HEARTFIELD, District Judge.
The above-entitled and numbered criminal action was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(3). The Report and Recommendation on Revocation of Supervised Release, filed on January 14, 2016, has been presented for consideration. The parties waived any objections to the Report and Recommendation. Defendant consented to the revocation of his supervised release and waived his right to be present and speak at sentencing.
The Court is of the opinion that the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct. Therefore, the Court hereby adopts the Report and Recommendation on Revocation of Supervised Release as the findings and conclusions of the Court.
Source: Leagle
