Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

C.N. v. Ridgewood Bd of Ed, 04-2849 (2005)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit Number: 04-2849 Visitors: 13
Filed: Dec. 12, 2005
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: Opinions of the United 2005 Decisions States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 12-12-2005 C.N. v. Ridgewood Bd of Ed Precedential or Non-Precedential: Precedential Docket No. 04-2849 Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2005 Recommended Citation "C.N. v. Ridgewood Bd of Ed" (2005). 2005 Decisions. Paper 25. http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2005/25 This decision is brought to you for free and open access by the Opinions
More
Opinions of the United 2005 Decisions States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 12-12-2005 C.N. v. Ridgewood Bd of Ed Precedential or Non-Precedential: Precedential Docket No. 04-2849 Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2005 Recommended Citation "C.N. v. Ridgewood Bd of Ed" (2005). 2005 Decisions. Paper 25. http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2005/25 This decision is brought to you for free and open access by the Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit at Villanova University School of Law Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in 2005 Decisions by an authorized administrator of Villanova University School of Law Digital Repository. For more information, please contact Benjamin.Carlson@law.villanova.edu. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT No. 04-2849 C. N., Individually and as Guardian Ad Litem of J.N., a Minor; L. M., Individually and as Guardian Ad Litem of V.M., a Minor; M. E., Individually and as Guardian Ad Litem of J.E., a Minor, Appellants v. RIDGEWOOD BOARD OF EDUCATION; FREDERICK J. STOKLEY; JOYCE SNIDER; RONALD VERDICCHIO; ROBERT WEAKLEY; JOHN MUCCIOLO; ANTHONY BENCIVENGA; SHEILA BROGAN On Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey (D.C. No. 00-cv-01072) District Judge: Honorable Jose L. Linares Argued April 1, 2005 Before: ALITO, SMITH and FISHER, Circuit Judges. ORDER AMENDING OPINION IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the opinion in the above case, filed December 1, 2005, be amended as follows: Page 31, the last two sentences in the first full paragraph, which read: We explain both conclusions in Part V, sub-sections A & B. Then, in Part VI, we explain why, even assuming the survey was involuntary, no constitutional violations have been shown. shall read: We explain both conclusions in Part IV, sub-sections A & B. Then, in Part V, we explain why, even assuming the survey was involuntary, no constitutional violations have been shown. By the Court, /s/ D. Michael Fisher Circuit Judge Dated: December 12, 2005 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer