Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Kuck v. Robinson, 3:18-cv-157. (2019)

Court: District Court, S.D. Ohio Number: infdco20190215c63 Visitors: 17
Filed: Feb. 14, 2019
Latest Update: Feb. 14, 2019
Summary: ORDER ADOPTING REPORTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS THOMAS M. ROSE , District Judge . The Court has reviewed the Supplemental Report and Recommendations of United States Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz (ECF No. 25), to whom this case was referred pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b), and noting that no objections have been filed, and that the time for filing such objections under Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) has expired, hereby ADOPTS said Supplemental Report and Recommendations. Accordingly, it is hereby ORDE
More

ORDER ADOPTING REPORTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

The Court has reviewed the Supplemental Report and Recommendations of United States Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz (ECF No. 25), to whom this case was referred pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b), and noting that no objections have been filed, and that the time for filing such objections under Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) has expired, hereby ADOPTS said Supplemental Report and Recommendations.

Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that the Petition herein be DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. The Clerk shall enter judgment accordingly. Because reasonable jurists would not disagree with that disposition, Petitioner is DENIED a certificate of appealability and the Court hereby certifies to the United States Court of Appeals that an appeal would be objectively frivolous and therefore should not be permitted to proceed in forma pauperis.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer