Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

KRISHNAN v. MAJKA, 13-15-00591-CV. (2017)

Court: Court of Appeals of Texas Number: intxco20170302804 Visitors: 16
Filed: Mar. 02, 2017
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2017
Summary: MEMORANDUM OPINION Memorandum Opinion by Justice GINA M. BENAVIDES . Appellants, Ravinderan Krishnan, M.D., and Ravi Krishnan, M.D., P.A., d/b/a The Eye Institute of Corpus Christi, perfected an appeal from a judgment entered by the County Court at Law No. 2 of Nueces County, Texas, in cause number 2015-CCV-62214-2. Appellants have filed a motion to dismiss the appeal on grounds the underlying circumstances necessitating this appeal are no longer present rendering this appeal no longer ne
More

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellants, Ravinderan Krishnan, M.D., and Ravi Krishnan, M.D., P.A., d/b/a The Eye Institute of Corpus Christi, perfected an appeal from a judgment entered by the County Court at Law No. 2 of Nueces County, Texas, in cause number 2015-CCV-62214-2. Appellants have filed a motion to dismiss the appeal on grounds the underlying circumstances necessitating this appeal are no longer present rendering this appeal no longer necessary. Appellants request that this Court dismiss the appeal.

The Court, having considered the documents on file and appellants' motion to dismiss the appeal, is of the opinion that the motion should be GRANTED. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a). Appellants' motion to dismiss is granted, and the appeal is hereby DISMISSED. Costs will be taxed against appellants. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(d) ("Absent agreement of the parties, the court will tax costs against the appellant."). Having dismissed the appeal at appellants' request, no motion for rehearing will be entertained, and our mandate will issue forthwith.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer