Hash v. Colvin, 2:14-cv-00259-LRS. (2015)
Court: District Court, D. Washington
Number: infdco20150717d35
Visitors: 8
Filed: Jul. 16, 2015
Latest Update: Jul. 16, 2015
Summary: ORDER LONNY R. SUKO , Senior District Judge . Based on the stipulation of the parties, it is hereby ORDERED that the above-captioned case be reversed and remanded for further administrative proceedings including a de novo hearing pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. 405(g). On remand, a new administrative law judge (ALJ) shall offer Plaintiff an opportunity for a new hearing, further update the medical record, and issue a new decision. The ALJ shall also: • Further consider the VA d
Summary: ORDER LONNY R. SUKO , Senior District Judge . Based on the stipulation of the parties, it is hereby ORDERED that the above-captioned case be reversed and remanded for further administrative proceedings including a de novo hearing pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. 405(g). On remand, a new administrative law judge (ALJ) shall offer Plaintiff an opportunity for a new hearing, further update the medical record, and issue a new decision. The ALJ shall also: • Further consider the VA di..
More
ORDER
LONNY R. SUKO, Senior District Judge.
Based on the stipulation of the parties, it is hereby ORDERED that the above-captioned case be reversed and remanded for further administrative proceedings including a de novo hearing pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g).
On remand, a new administrative law judge (ALJ) shall offer Plaintiff an opportunity for a new hearing, further update the medical record, and issue a new decision. The ALJ shall also:
• Further consider the VA disability ratings and obtain the VA Rating Decision that provides an explanation of the March 6, 2012 decision, if available, and consider the Order of the Board of Veterans' Appeals dated July 19, 2013, submitted to the Appeals Council (Exhibit 13E) and evaluate the VA disability determination pursuant to 20 CFR 404.1512(b)(5) and Social Security Ruling 06-03p.
• Reevaluate the medical source opinions of record;
• Reassess Plaintiff's maximum residual functional capacity (RFC), specifically with consideration to the opinions of record from all medical source opinions and fashion a complete RFC finding. The ALJ should provide specific reasoning for the weight given to opinion evidence, discussing the evidentiary basis for conclusions along with an adequate rationale for either accepting or rejecting probative medical opinions, and giving consideration to obtaining medical expert testimony;
• Reassess step five addressing whether plaintiff is able to make a vocational adjustment to other work existing in significant numbers in the national economy, with the assistance of a vocational expert.
The parties agree that reasonable attorney fees will be awarded under the Equal Access to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2412, upon proper request to the Court.
Source: Leagle
