Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

United States v. Naranjo, 03-4759 (2005)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit Number: 03-4759 Visitors: 13
Filed: Oct. 20, 2005
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: Opinions of the United 2005 Decisions States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 10-20-2005 USA v. Naranjo Precedential or Non-Precedential: Precedential Docket No. 03-4759 Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2005 Recommended Citation "USA v. Naranjo" (2005). 2005 Decisions. Paper 291. http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2005/291 This decision is brought to you for free and open access by the Opinions of the United States
More
Opinions of the United 2005 Decisions States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 10-20-2005 USA v. Naranjo Precedential or Non-Precedential: Precedential Docket No. 03-4759 Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2005 Recommended Citation "USA v. Naranjo" (2005). 2005 Decisions. Paper 291. http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2005/291 This decision is brought to you for free and open access by the Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit at Villanova University School of Law Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in 2005 Decisions by an authorized administrator of Villanova University School of Law Digital Repository. For more information, please contact Benjamin.Carlson@law.villanova.edu. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT _______________________ No.: 03-4759 _______________________ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. ADOLFO NARANJO, Appellant __________________________ On Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania (Crim. No. 03-CR-00253-1) District Judge: Hon. James T. Giles ______________________________ BEFORE: ALITO, McKEE and SMITH, Circuit Judges. ORDER AMENDING OPINION IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, that the Slip Opinion filed in this case on September 23, 2005, be amended as follows: On page 8, at footnote 5, after “Agent Rodgers explained that” and before “Naranjo” insert “he did not actually see”. Additionally, in that same sentence, replace “signed” with “sign”. IT IS SO ORDERED. BY THE COURT: /s/ Theordore A. McKee Circuit Judge Dated: October 20, 2005
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer