Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

U.S. v. Siglinger, 1:17CR18. (2017)

Court: District Court, N.D. West Virginia Number: infdco20170706819 Visitors: 4
Filed: Jun. 20, 2017
Latest Update: Jun. 20, 2017
Summary: ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION CONCERNING PLEA OF GUILTY IN FELONY CASE (DKT. NO. 26), ACCEPTING GUILTY PLEA, AND SCHEDULING SENTENCING HEARING IRENE M. KEELEY , District Judge . On June 5, 2017, the defendant, Anthony R. Siglinger ("Siglinger"), appeared before United States Magistrate Judge Michael J. Aloi and moved for permission to enter a plea of GUILTY to Count Two of the Indictment. After Siglinger stated that he understood that the magistrate judge is n
More

ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION CONCERNING PLEA OF GUILTY IN FELONY CASE (DKT. NO. 26), ACCEPTING GUILTY PLEA, AND SCHEDULING SENTENCING HEARING

On June 5, 2017, the defendant, Anthony R. Siglinger ("Siglinger"), appeared before United States Magistrate Judge Michael J. Aloi and moved for permission to enter a plea of GUILTY to Count Two of the Indictment. After Siglinger stated that he understood that the magistrate judge is not a United States District Judge, he consented to tendering his plea before the magistrate judge. Previously, this Court had referred the guilty plea to the magistrate judge for the purposes of administering the allocution pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11, making a finding as to whether the plea was knowingly and voluntarily entered, and recommending to this Court whether the plea should be accepted.

Based upon Siglinger's statements during the plea hearing and the government's proffer establishing that an independent factual basis for the plea existed, the magistrate judge found that Siglinger was competent to enter a plea, that the plea was freely and voluntarily given, that he was aware of the nature of the charges against him and the consequences of his plea, and that a factual basis existed for the tendered plea. On June 5, 2017, the magistrate judge entered a Report and Recommendation Concerning Plea of Guilty in Felony Case ("R&R") (dkt. no. 26) finding a factual basis for the plea and recommending that this Court accept Siglinger's plea of guilty to Count Two of the Indictment.

The magistrate judge also directed the parties to file any written objections to the R&R within fourteen (14) days after service of the R&R. He further advised that failure to file objections would result in a waiver of the right to appeal from a judgment of this Court based on the R&R. The parties did not file any objections to the R&R.

Accordingly, this Court ADOPTS the magistrate judge's R&R, ACCEPTS Siglinger's guilty plea, and ADJUGES him GUILTY of the crime charged in Count Two of the Indictment.

Pursuant to Fed. R. Crim. P. 11(c)(3) and U.S.S.G. § 6B1.1(c), the Court DEFERS acceptance of the proposed plea agreement until it has received and reviewed the presentence report prepared in this matter.

Pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 6A1 et seq., the Court ORDERS as follows:

1. The Probation Officer shall undertake a presentence investigation of Siglinger, and prepare a presentence report for the Court;

2. The Government and Siglinger shall provide their versions of the offense to the probation officer by June 27, 2017;

3. The presentence report shall be disclosed to Siglinger, defense counsel, and the United States on or before August 28, 2017; however, the Probation Officer shall not disclose any sentencing recommendations made pursuant to Fed. R. Crim. P. 32(e)(3);

4. Counsel may file written objections to the presentence report on or before September 12, 2017;

5. The Office of Probation shall submit the presentence report with addendum to the Court on or before September 20, 2017; and

6. Counsel may file any written sentencing statements and motions for departure from the Sentencing Guidelines, including the factual basis from the statements or motions, on or before September 20, 2017.

The magistrate judge continued Siglinger on bond pursuant to the Order Setting Conditions of Release (dkt. no. 9) entered on April 19, 2017.

The Court will conduct the sentencing hearing for the defendant on Tuesday, October 3, 2017 at 2:00 P.M. at the Clarksburg, West Virginia point of holding court.

It is so ORDERED.

The Clerk is directed to transmit copies of this Order to counsel of record and all appropriate agencies.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer