Filed: Apr. 22, 2016
Latest Update: Apr. 22, 2016
Summary: OPINION AND ORDER CAMERON McGOWAN CURRIE , Senior District Judge . This matter is before the court on Defendant's letter, construed as motion for reduction of sentence, regarding the need to "help me with a Rule 35 or a 5K1 so I can get a time cut." ECF No. 1154. Rule 35(a) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure permits a court to "correct a sentence that resulted from arithmetical, technical, or other clear error" within fourteen days after the oral announcement of the sentence. See R
Summary: OPINION AND ORDER CAMERON McGOWAN CURRIE , Senior District Judge . This matter is before the court on Defendant's letter, construed as motion for reduction of sentence, regarding the need to "help me with a Rule 35 or a 5K1 so I can get a time cut." ECF No. 1154. Rule 35(a) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure permits a court to "correct a sentence that resulted from arithmetical, technical, or other clear error" within fourteen days after the oral announcement of the sentence. See Ru..
More
OPINION AND ORDER
CAMERON McGOWAN CURRIE, Senior District Judge.
This matter is before the court on Defendant's letter, construed as motion for reduction of sentence, regarding the need to "help me with a Rule 35 or a 5K1 so I can get a time cut." ECF No. 1154.
Rule 35(a) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure permits a court to "correct a sentence that resulted from arithmetical, technical, or other clear error" within fourteen days after the oral announcement of the sentence. See Rules 35(a) and (c), Fed.R.Crim.P. The sentence was orally announced on July 10, 2013, and, accordingly, the deadline for any action by the court on a Rule 35(a) motion is well past. Therefore, the court is without jurisdiction to act upon Defendant's motion in this regard.
Apart from Rule 35(a), a district court has no jurisdiction to alter a defendant's term of imprisonment except as authorized by 18 U.S.C. § 3582 or 18 U.S.C. § 3742.
Title 18 United States Code § 3582(c) limits the court's authority to modify a final judgment that includes a sentence of imprisonment to three specific circumstances. See 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (the court can modify a judgment (1) upon motion of the Director of the Bureau of Prisons ("BOP") for statutorily-specified reasons, (2) upon motion of the government for substantial assistance, or (3) upon motion of the defendant or the BOP, or upon the court's own motion, because of a subsequent lowering of the applicable sentencing range.). Defendant has not alleged that he has provided any substantial assistance to warrant a Rule 35(b) reduction in sentence. Therefore, none of these circumstances applies to Defendant's current motion.
After an appeal, the court can modify a sentence if the sentence is found by the appellate court to have been imposed in violation of law or imposed as a result of an incorrect application of the sentencing guidelines, as provided for in 18 U.S.C. § 3742. Defendant did not appeal his conviction or sentence.
Defendant's letter does not allege that any of these circumstances applies. The court lacks jurisdiction to modify Defendant's sentence, and therefore, Defendant's letter, construed as a motion for reduction of sentence, is denied for lack of jurisdiction.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
