Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

United States v. Wilson, 04-1918 (2005)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit Number: 04-1918 Visitors: 7
Filed: Jul. 07, 2005
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: Opinions of the United 2005 Decisions States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 7-7-2005 USA v. Wilson Precedential or Non-Precedential: Precedential Docket No. 04-1918 Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2005 Recommended Citation "USA v. Wilson" (2005). 2005 Decisions. Paper 776. http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2005/776 This decision is brought to you for free and open access by the Opinions of the United States Cour
More
Opinions of the United 2005 Decisions States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 7-7-2005 USA v. Wilson Precedential or Non-Precedential: Precedential Docket No. 04-1918 Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2005 Recommended Citation "USA v. Wilson" (2005). 2005 Decisions. Paper 776. http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2005/776 This decision is brought to you for free and open access by the Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit at Villanova University School of Law Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in 2005 Decisions by an authorized administrator of Villanova University School of Law Digital Repository. For more information, please contact Benjamin.Carlson@law.villanova.edu. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT No. 04-1918 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. ESCO WILSON, Appellant On Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania (D.C. Criminal Action No. 03-cr-00005) District Judge: Honorable Christopher C. Conner Before: SLOVITER, AMBRO and ALDISERT, Circuit Judges ORDER A the direction of the Court an amended opinion shall be filed in this matter with filing as of the date of this order. Due to a word processing error the dissenting opinion was incorrectly positioned in the opinion filed on July 1, 2005. It is noted that the amendment is clerical in nature and does not alter the prior disposition of the Court. For the Court, /s/ Marcia M. Waldron Clerk Date: July 7, 2005 CRG/cc: Andrew F. Schneider, Esq. Theodore B. Smith III, Esq.
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer