Valle-Cardenas v. Thomas, 2:17-CV-00417-JRG-RSP. (2019)
Court: District Court, E.D. Texas
Number: infdco20190930g47
Visitors: 4
Filed: Sep. 27, 2019
Latest Update: Sep. 27, 2019
Summary: JUDGMENT RODNEY GILSTRAP , District Judge . Now before the Court is the Report & Recommendation (Dkt. No. 8) by Magistrate Judge Payne, which recommends that that this case be dismissed for failure to prosecute. No objections have been filed. Having performed a de novo review of the record, the Court finds the Report & Recommendation is correct and is hereby ADOPTED. IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that Plaintiffs' complaint against Defendants is DISMISSED for failure to prosecute. So
Summary: JUDGMENT RODNEY GILSTRAP , District Judge . Now before the Court is the Report & Recommendation (Dkt. No. 8) by Magistrate Judge Payne, which recommends that that this case be dismissed for failure to prosecute. No objections have been filed. Having performed a de novo review of the record, the Court finds the Report & Recommendation is correct and is hereby ADOPTED. IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that Plaintiffs' complaint against Defendants is DISMISSED for failure to prosecute. So O..
More
JUDGMENT
RODNEY GILSTRAP, District Judge.
Now before the Court is the Report & Recommendation (Dkt. No. 8) by Magistrate Judge Payne, which recommends that that this case be dismissed for failure to prosecute. No objections have been filed. Having performed a de novo review of the record, the Court finds the Report & Recommendation is correct and is hereby ADOPTED.
IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that Plaintiffs' complaint against Defendants is DISMISSED for failure to prosecute.
So ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
