Filed: Jun. 17, 2005
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: Opinions of the United 2005 Decisions States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 6-17-2005 Cochran v. Pinchak Precedential or Non-Precedential: Precedential Docket No. 02-1047 Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2005 Recommended Citation "Cochran v. Pinchak" (2005). 2005 Decisions. Paper 916. http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2005/916 This decision is brought to you for free and open access by the Opinions of the United
Summary: Opinions of the United 2005 Decisions States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 6-17-2005 Cochran v. Pinchak Precedential or Non-Precedential: Precedential Docket No. 02-1047 Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2005 Recommended Citation "Cochran v. Pinchak" (2005). 2005 Decisions. Paper 916. http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2005/916 This decision is brought to you for free and open access by the Opinions of the United S..
More
Opinions of the United
2005 Decisions States Court of Appeals
for the Third Circuit
6-17-2005
Cochran v. Pinchak
Precedential or Non-Precedential: Precedential
Docket No. 02-1047
Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2005
Recommended Citation
"Cochran v. Pinchak" (2005). 2005 Decisions. Paper 916.
http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2005/916
This decision is brought to you for free and open access by the Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit at Villanova
University School of Law Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in 2005 Decisions by an authorized administrator of Villanova
University School of Law Digital Repository. For more information, please contact Benjamin.Carlson@law.villanova.edu.
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT
____________________
Case No: 02-1047
______________________
OLIVER COCHRAN
Appellant
v.
STEVEN PINCHAK, Administrator of East Jersey State Prison;
PATRICK ARVONIO, Administrator of East Jersey State Prison;
ALFIERO ORTIZ, Assistant Administrator of East Jersey State Prison;
TERRANCE MOORE, Assistant Administrator of East Jersey State Prison;
MICHAEL POWERS; DR. FREDERICK BAUER; LT. "JOHN" MILLER;
SGT. "JOHN" TARZA; DR. FRANKLIN H. SPIRN; DR. HOWARD M. EPSTEIN;
NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS; THOMAS D. FARRELL,
Supervisor of the Health Services Unit of the New Jersey
Department of Corrections; SCOTT A. FAUNCE, Administrator of
Bayside State Prison; CHARLES LEONE, Assistant Administrator of
Bayside State Prison; "JANE" MERITT, Classification Supervisor
of Bayside State Prison; "JOHN" BLOUNT, Correction Officer; "JOHN" ALENDE,
Correction Officer; "JOHN" DAVENPORT, Correction Officer;
"JOHN" SNELL, Correction Officer; SERGEANT "JOHN" PERGANSKI,
Correction Officer; SERGEANT "JOHN" DAVIS, Correction Officer;
CORRECTIONAL MEDICAL SERVICES; DR. HERTZEL ZACKAI; DR. "JOHN"
CARLINO; LISA LITTLE, Hospital Administrator for Bayside State Prison;
MARGE AMODEL
Appellees
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Intervenor
Before: SCIRICA, Chief Judge, FISHER and ALDISERT, Circuit Judges,
ORDER SUR PETITION FOR PANEL REHEARING
It appearing that the Supreme Court has before it the consolidated cases of
United States v. Georgia, No. 04-1203, and Goodman v. Georgia, No. 04-1236, cert
granted May 16, 2005, that are appeals from the Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
which discuss Miller v. King,
384 F.3d 1248 (11th Cir. 2004), a case relied on by the
majority opinion in the within case, it is ORDERED that the Petitions for Panel
Rehearing be and are hereby GRANTED, that the opinion and judgment in the within
case be VACATED and that the matter be held C.A.V. until such time as the Supreme
Court decides the consolidated cases of United States v. Georgia, No. 04-1203, and
Goodman v. Georgia, No. 04-1236.
BY THE COURT
/s/ Ruggero J. Aldisert
Circuit Judge
Dated: June 17, 2005
CMH/cc: JVD, DMR, SEH