Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

United States v. Jimenez-Brambila, CR16-103 TSZ. (2019)

Court: District Court, D. Washington Number: infdco20190716f58 Visitors: 6
Filed: Jul. 15, 2019
Latest Update: Jul. 15, 2019
Summary: ORDER THOMAS S. ZILLY , District Judge . THIS MATTER having come before the Court on defendant's unopposed motion for a continuance of the trial and the pretrial motions due date, docket no. 25, and the Court having considered the facts set forth in the motion, the speedy trial waiver executed by defendant, and the records and files herein, the Court enters the following order: 1. A failure to grant the continuance would deny defense counsel the reasonable time necessary for effective prep
More

ORDER

THIS MATTER having come before the Court on defendant's unopposed motion for a continuance of the trial and the pretrial motions due date, docket no. 25, and the Court having considered the facts set forth in the motion, the speedy trial waiver executed by defendant, and the records and files herein, the Court enters the following order:

1. A failure to grant the continuance would deny defense counsel the reasonable time necessary for effective preparation, taking into account the exercise of due diligence, within the meaning of 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(B)(iv). In addition, the failure to grant a continuance in the proceeding would be likely to result in a miscarriage of justice, within the meaning of 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(B)(i).

2. The ends of justice will be served by ordering a continuance in this case, as a continuance is necessary to ensure adequate time for the defense to effectively prepare for trial. All of these factors outweigh the best interests of the public and defendant in a more speedy trial, within the meaning of 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7).

For the foregoing reasons, the unopposed motion to continue trial, docket no. 25, is GRANTED. The trial date shall be continued from August 26, 2019, to September 30, 2019. Pretrial motions are to be filed no later than August 26, 2019.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the resulting period of delay from the date of this Order until the new trial date is hereby excluded for speedy trial purposes under 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A) and (B).

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer