Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

HOLLIS v. HOWARD, 3-14-2343. (2016)

Court: District Court, M.D. Tennessee Number: infdco20160121b86 Visitors: 16
Filed: Jan. 20, 2016
Latest Update: Jan. 20, 2016
Summary: ORDER TODD J. CAMPBELL , District Judge . Pending before the Court are Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (Docket No. 33) and Defendants' Request for Leave to File Reply (Docket No. 42). Defendants' Request for Leave to File Reply is GRANTED, and the Clerk is directed to file the Reply attached to the Request (Docket No. 42-1). The referral of dispositive motions to the Magistrate Judge is revoked. For the reasons stated in the accompanying Memorandum, Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (Docket No.
More

ORDER

Pending before the Court are Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (Docket No. 33) and Defendants' Request for Leave to File Reply (Docket No. 42). Defendants' Request for Leave to File Reply is GRANTED, and the Clerk is directed to file the Reply attached to the Request (Docket No. 42-1).

The referral of dispositive motions to the Magistrate Judge is revoked. For the reasons stated in the accompanying Memorandum, Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (Docket No. 33) is GRANTED, and this action is DISMISSED. Any other pending Motions are denied as moot, and the Clerk is directed to close the file. This Order shall constitute the final judgment in this case pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 58.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer