Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

NAUMAN v. UTAH HIGHWAY PATROL, 2:14-cv-00560-CW-DBP. (2015)

Court: District Court, D. Utah Number: infdco20150928a86 Visitors: 14
Filed: Sep. 25, 2015
Latest Update: Sep. 25, 2015
Summary: ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION CLARK WADDOUPS , District Judge . This case was assigned to United States District Court Judge Clark Waddoups, who then referred it to United States Magistrate Dustin B. Pead under 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(B). (Dkt. No. 19). The case arises out of Thomas J. Nauman's complaint, in which he alleges he suffered personal injury when Neil Ekberg arrested him. (Dkt. No. 1). The Defendants filed an answer to Mr. Nauman's complaint five days after the deadline,
More

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

This case was assigned to United States District Court Judge Clark Waddoups, who then referred it to United States Magistrate Dustin B. Pead under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B). (Dkt. No. 19). The case arises out of Thomas J. Nauman's complaint, in which he alleges he suffered personal injury when Neil Ekberg arrested him. (Dkt. No. 1). The Defendants filed an answer to Mr. Nauman's complaint five days after the deadline, (Dkt. No. 3) and Mr. Nauman filed a motion for default judgment (Dkt. No. 9). After briefing from the parties, Judge Pead issued a Report and Recommendation, recommending that the court deny the motion for default judgment. (Dkt. No. 21). Mr. Nauman did not file an objection. The court has reviewed the file de novo, and hereby APPROVES AND ADOPTS Judge Pead's Report and Recommendation in its entirety.

SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer