Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Gripper v. Ormond, 3:18CV580. (2020)

Court: District Court, D. Virginia Number: infdco20200121c00 Visitors: 6
Filed: Jan. 14, 2020
Latest Update: Jan. 14, 2020
Summary: FINAL ORDER M. HANNAH LAUCK , District Judge . In accordance with the accompanying Memorandum Opinion, it is hereby ORDERED that: 1. Gripper's Informal Opening Brief, liberally construed as an objection to the Report and Recommendation, (EOF No. 18), is OVERRULED; 2. The Report and Recommendation (EOF No. 17) is ACCEPTED and ADOPTED; 3. Gripper's Motion for Leave to Supplement (ECF No. 16.) is GRANTED; 4. Respondent's Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 14) is GRANTED; 5. Gripper's 2241 Peti
More

FINAL ORDER

In accordance with the accompanying Memorandum Opinion, it is hereby ORDERED that:

1. Gripper's Informal Opening Brief, liberally construed as an objection to the Report and Recommendation, (EOF No. 18), is OVERRULED; 2. The Report and Recommendation (EOF No. 17) is ACCEPTED and ADOPTED; 3. Gripper's Motion for Leave to Supplement (ECF No. 16.) is GRANTED; 4. Respondent's Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 14) is GRANTED; 5. Gripper's § 2241 Petition (ECF No. 3) is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE; and, 6. Gripper's claims and the action are DISMISSED.

Should Gripper desire to appeal, a written notice of appeal must be filed with the Clerk of the Court within sixty (60) days of the date of entry hereof. Failure to file a notice of appeal within that period may result in the loss of the right to appeal.

The Clerk is DIRECTED to send the Memorandum Opinion and Order to Gripper and counsel of record.

It is SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer