Accelerated Collection Services, Inc. v. Hause, C17-1473JLR. (2018)
Court: District Court, D. Washington
Number: infdco20180221a63
Visitors: 16
Filed: Jan. 05, 2018
Latest Update: Jan. 05, 2018
Summary: ORDER OF DISMISSAL JAMES L. ROBART , District Judge . The Status Report in this case was due no later than November 30, 2017 (10/26/17 Order (Dkt. # 7)), but the parties failed to file their joint Status Report by that deadline ( see Dkt.). On December 14, 2017, the court ordered the parties to show cause by December 22, 2017, why this action should not be dismissed for failure to comply with the court's order. (12/14/17 Min. Order (Dkt. # 9) at 1-2.) The court cautioned the parties that f
Summary: ORDER OF DISMISSAL JAMES L. ROBART , District Judge . The Status Report in this case was due no later than November 30, 2017 (10/26/17 Order (Dkt. # 7)), but the parties failed to file their joint Status Report by that deadline ( see Dkt.). On December 14, 2017, the court ordered the parties to show cause by December 22, 2017, why this action should not be dismissed for failure to comply with the court's order. (12/14/17 Min. Order (Dkt. # 9) at 1-2.) The court cautioned the parties that fa..
More
ORDER OF DISMISSAL
JAMES L. ROBART, District Judge.
The Status Report in this case was due no later than November 30, 2017 (10/26/17 Order (Dkt. # 7)), but the parties failed to file their joint Status Report by that deadline (see Dkt.). On December 14, 2017, the court ordered the parties to show cause by December 22, 2017, why this action should not be dismissed for failure to comply with the court's order. (12/14/17 Min. Order (Dkt. # 9) at 1-2.) The court cautioned the parties that failure to timely respond would result in dismissal without prejudice. (Id.) The December 22, 2017, deadline has since passed, and the parties have not responded to the court's order or otherwise filed anything on the docket. (See Dkt.) Accordingly, the court DISMISSES this matter without prejudice for failure to prosecute. See In re Donovan, 871 F.2d 807, 808-09 (9th Cir. 1989); Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).
Source: Leagle
